Deaver v. Mims, 1:11-cv-01736-SKO (PC). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160524707
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Jason Deaver, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 on October 17, 2011. The deadline to file dispositive motions lapsed on April 22, 2016. (Doc. 76.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this action will be set for trial.
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Jason Deaver, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 on October 17, 2011. The deadline to file dispositive motions lapsed on April 22, 2016. (Doc. 76.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this action will be set for trial. ..
More
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO NOTIFY COURT WHETHER A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE WOULD BE BENEFICIAL
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Jason Deaver, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 17, 2011. The deadline to file dispositive motions lapsed on April 22, 2016. (Doc. 76.) The possibility of settlement must be explored before this action will be set for trial.
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED, that within twenty-one (21) days of the date of service of this order, the parties shall file statements indicating whether they believe, in good faith, that settlement is a possibility in this case and whether a settlement conference would be beneficial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
