Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Estrada, 07-307 WBS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160524734 Visitors: 18
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADMIT DENY HEARING RE: SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Amy Hitchcock, Assistant United States Attorney, and Dustin D. Johnson, Counsel for Richard Estrada, that the Admit-Deny Hearing date of May 23, 2016 be vacated, and the matter be set for the Admit-Deny Hearing on July 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The reason for this con
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE ADMIT DENY HEARING RE: SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Amy Hitchcock, Assistant United States Attorney, and Dustin D. Johnson, Counsel for Richard Estrada, that the Admit-Deny Hearing date of May 23, 2016 be vacated, and the matter be set for the Admit-Deny Hearing on July 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel, who was appointed on May 17, 2016, to represent Mr. Estrada, additional time to review the case and discuss the case with Mr. Estrada. The reason for the length of the continuance is due to the unavailability of the supervising probation officer, who is unavailable during the month of June.

The prosecutor has authorized defense counsel to sign this stipulation on her behalf.

The probation officer does not object to the continuance.

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that 1) the Admit-Deny Hearing date of May 23, 2016 be vacated, 2) the matter be set for Admit-Deny Hearing on July 11, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer