Barron v. Martel, 2:10-cv-1567-WBS-EFB P (TEMP). (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160524737
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 23, 2016
Latest Update: May 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFTER HEARING EDMUND F. BRENNAN , District Judge . This matter came before the court on May 18, 2016, on a motion to withdraw brought by plaintiff's counsel. In accordance with Local Rule 182, and for the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's counsel's motion is granted. The court also addressed a motion to remove an inadvertently filed document brought by plaintiff's counsel. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion was denied. See In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1
Summary: ORDER AFTER HEARING EDMUND F. BRENNAN , District Judge . This matter came before the court on May 18, 2016, on a motion to withdraw brought by plaintiff's counsel. In accordance with Local Rule 182, and for the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's counsel's motion is granted. The court also addressed a motion to remove an inadvertently filed document brought by plaintiff's counsel. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion was denied. See In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 13..
More
ORDER AFTER HEARING
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, District Judge.
This matter came before the court on May 18, 2016, on a motion to withdraw brought by plaintiff's counsel. In accordance with Local Rule 182, and for the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff's counsel's motion is granted.
The court also addressed a motion to remove an inadvertently filed document brought by plaintiff's counsel. For the reasons stated on the record, the motion was denied. See In re Seagate Technology, 497 F.3d 1360, 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007) ("The attorney-client privilege belongs to the client, who alone may waive it.").
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion to withdraw as counsel (ECF No. 92) is granted; and
2. The motion to remove an inadvertently filed document (ECF No. 94) is denied.
Source: Leagle
