Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 7, 12, 17, 18) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On May 23, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action in its entirety with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 18.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been di
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 7, 12, 17, 18) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On May 23, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action in its entirety with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 18.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dis..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. Nos. 7, 12, 17, 18)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
On May 23, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action in its entirety with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. (Doc. No. 18.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of attorneys' fees and costs to either party. All pending motions (Doc. Nos. 7, 12, and 17) are dismissed as moot. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
