U.S. v. Cruz-Sanchez, 1:14-CR-00179-(1)-LJO-SKO. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160526857
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER REFERRING CASE TO FEDERAL DEFENDER'S OFFICE (Doc. 71) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . On May 19, 2016, Defendant Lucio Cruz-Sanchez filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence (Doc. 71) pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ("Section 3582 Motion"). Pursuant to Eastern District of California General Order 546, the Federal Defender's Office ("FDO") is hereby appointed to represent Defendant in this matter. From the filing date of this Order, the FDO SH
Summary: ORDER REFERRING CASE TO FEDERAL DEFENDER'S OFFICE (Doc. 71) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , District Judge . On May 19, 2016, Defendant Lucio Cruz-Sanchez filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence (Doc. 71) pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ("Section 3582 Motion"). Pursuant to Eastern District of California General Order 546, the Federal Defender's Office ("FDO") is hereby appointed to represent Defendant in this matter. From the filing date of this Order, the FDO SHA..
More
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO FEDERAL DEFENDER'S OFFICE
(Doc. 71)
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.
On May 19, 2016, Defendant Lucio Cruz-Sanchez filed a pro se motion to reduce his sentence (Doc. 71) pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ("Section 3582 Motion"). Pursuant to Eastern District of California General Order 546, the Federal Defender's Office ("FDO") is hereby appointed to represent Defendant in this matter. From the filing date of this Order, the FDO SHALL have 90 days, on or before August 17, 2016, to file a supplement to Defendant's pro se Section 3582 Motion or to notify the Court that it does not intend to file a supplement to the motion. Thereafter, the government SHALL have 30 days from the date of the FDO's filing to file a response to Defendant's Section 3582 Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
