Gray v. Romero, 1:13-cv-01473-DLB PC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160527858
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 26, 2016
Latest Update: May 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT ZIOMEK DENNIS L. BECK , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt. On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, not all Defendants had appeared in
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT ZIOMEK DENNIS L. BECK , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt. On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, not all Defendants had appeared in ..
More
ORDER EXTENDING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER TO DEFENDANT ZIOMEK
DENNIS L. BECK, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint for violation of the Eighth Amendment against Defendants Romero, Comelli, Rebel, Ziomek, Mundunuri and Loadholt.
On May 2, 2016, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order. At the time, not all Defendants had appeared in this action.
On May 25, 2016, Defendant Ziomek filed an answer. Therefore, the Court EXTENDS the May 2, 2016, Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Ziomek.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
