Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Molinero-Gutierrez, 2:14-CR-00179 MCE. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160527909 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME MORRISON C. ENGLAND , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Marvin Molinero-Gutierrez, that the status conference scheduled for May 26, 2016 be vacated and be continued to June
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Marvin Molinero-Gutierrez, that the status conference scheduled for May 26, 2016 be vacated and be continued to June 2, 2016 at10:00 a.m.

The reason for continuance is to allow defense counsel to meet and confer with Mr. Molinero-Gutierrez about the Court's recent ruling on the Motion to Dismiss (CR 43) and to discuss a possible resolution of this matter.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as of this order's date through and including June 2, 2016; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including June 2, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the May 26, 2016 status conference shall be continued until June 2 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer