Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Munoz, 1:14-cr-00270 AWI-BAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160531c10 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: APPOINTMENT ORDER ANTHONY W. ISHII , District Judge . Pursuant to General Order No. 563 and the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(1) and (c), the Office of the Federal Defender is appointed to represent this defendant-movant, JULIO MUNOZ, JR., to determine whether he may qualify for relief under either 28 U.S.C. 2255 or 28 U.S.C. 2241 in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), and to present any petitions,
More

APPOINTMENT ORDER

Pursuant to General Order No. 563 and the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3006A(a)(1) and (c), the Office of the Federal Defender is appointed to represent this defendant-movant, JULIO MUNOZ, JR., to determine whether he may qualify for relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2255 or 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015), and to present any petitions, motions, or applications relating thereto for disposition. Due to a conflict, the Federal Defender respectfully requests that the Office of the Federal Defender be relieved from assuming appointment in the above captioned case and that attorney

be appointed counsel for Mr. Munoz for Johnson matters, further proceedings in district court, and any resulting appeal.

I accept the appointment and ask the order to be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer