MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
WHEREAS, on
WHEREAS, any motion to dismiss the TAC by Defendant Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Holdings Corporation ("Umpqua") and Defendant Associated Pension Consultants Inc. ("APC") would be due on
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant Umpqua's and/or Defendant APC's motion to dismiss the TAC would be due, at the latest, fourteen (14) days thereafter, on
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Defendant Umpqua's and/or Defendant APC's reply to Plaintiffs' opposition would be due, at the latest, seven (7) days thereafter, on
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs has a previously scheduled oral argument before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals set for
WHEREAS, Defendant Umpqua, Defendant APC, and Plaintiffs, agree that it would be in the best interests of each of these parties to revise the briefing schedule mandated by the applicable rules;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Defendants Umpqua and APC, on the other, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 143 and 144, and subject to approval by the Court:
1. Defendants Umpqua and APC shall have thirty (30) days from
2. If Defendants' responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' TAC is in the form of a motion under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b):
A. Plaintiffs' opposition to any such motion will be due thirty (30) days from the date Defendants' motion is filed; and
B. Defendants' reply in support of any such motion will be due fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiffs' opposition is filed.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,