Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PASKENTA BAND OF NOMLAKI INDIANS v. CROSBY, 2:15-cv-00538-MCE-CMK. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160603b64 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, on May 20, 2016 , the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed the Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") in this action; WHEREAS, any motion to dismiss the TAC by Defendant Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Holdings Corporation ("Umpqua") and Defendant Associated Pension Consultants Inc. ("APC") would be due on June 6, 2016 ; WHEREAS, pursuant to Civi
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REVISED BRIEFING SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, on May 20, 2016, the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians and Paskenta Enterprises Corporation ("Plaintiffs") filed the Third Amended Complaint ("TAC") in this action;

WHEREAS, any motion to dismiss the TAC by Defendant Umpqua Bank and Umpqua Holdings Corporation ("Umpqua") and Defendant Associated Pension Consultants Inc. ("APC") would be due on June 6, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant Umpqua's and/or Defendant APC's motion to dismiss the TAC would be due, at the latest, fourteen (14) days thereafter, on June 20, 2016;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 230, Defendant Umpqua's and/or Defendant APC's reply to Plaintiffs' opposition would be due, at the latest, seven (7) days thereafter, on June 27, 2016;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs has a previously scheduled oral argument before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals set for June 21, 2016, and would be hard-pressed to devote the necessary time and resources to the briefing required in this matter as the briefing schedule now stands;

WHEREAS, Defendant Umpqua, Defendant APC, and Plaintiffs, agree that it would be in the best interests of each of these parties to revise the briefing schedule mandated by the applicable rules;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Defendants Umpqua and APC, on the other, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 143 and 144, and subject to approval by the Court:

1. Defendants Umpqua and APC shall have thirty (30) days from May 20, 2016, up to and including June 20, 2016, to file a responsive pleading in this matter;

2. If Defendants' responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' TAC is in the form of a motion under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b):

A. Plaintiffs' opposition to any such motion will be due thirty (30) days from the date Defendants' motion is filed; and

B. Defendants' reply in support of any such motion will be due fourteen (14) days from the date Plaintiffs' opposition is filed.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer