Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LARSON v. HARMAN-MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 1:16-cv-00219-DAD-SKO. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160614665 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 3SEVENTY, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A THREE-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Doc. 19) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having read and considered Defendant 3Seventy, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for a Three-Week Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 19), and for good cause shown, GRANTS the Motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant 3Seventy, Inc.'s response to Plaintiff's Complaint
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT 3SEVENTY, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A THREE-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(Doc. 19)

The Court, having read and considered Defendant 3Seventy, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for a Three-Week Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 19), and for good cause shown, GRANTS the Motion.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant 3Seventy, Inc.'s response to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be due on June 30, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer