Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RAMIREZ, 2:05-cr-0456 MCE CKD. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160617768 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, the court must review all 2255 motions and summarily deny any motion if it is plain that the defendant is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review and finds that summary denial of the 2255 motion is not appropriate. Therefore
More

ORDER

Defendant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, the court must review all § 2255 motions and summarily deny any motion if it is plain that the defendant is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review and finds that summary denial of the § 2255 motion is not appropriate. Therefore, plaintiff will be directed to file a response.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff is directed to file an answer within sixty days of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.

2. Plaintiff shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the motion. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings.

3. Defendant's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date plaintiff's answer is filed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer