Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Stanley, 2:16-cr-093 MCE. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160621a18 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Owen Roth, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for William Stanley, that the status conference scheduled for June 16, 2016 be vacated and continued to July 7, 2016 at 10:00
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Owen Roth, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for William Stanley, that the status conference scheduled for June 16, 2016 be vacated and continued to July 7, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

The Government has produced approximately 1,200 bates-numbered documents and made a banker's box of documents available for review. Defense counsel for Mr. Stanley requires additional time to review the discovery, to conduct additional investigation and legal research, and to confer with his client about how to proceed in this case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as of June 14, 2016, the date of the parties' stipulation, through and including July 7, 2016; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. It specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence and that the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

Time from the date of the parties' stipulation, June 14, 2016, up to and including July 7, 2016, is hereby excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the June 16, 2016 status conference shall be continued until July 7, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer