Filed: Jun. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER] JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . COME NOW, Plaintiff, KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez and Defendants, COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY JASON AYALA an DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, who have met and conferred through their respective attorneys of record, and now make this joint stipulated request of the Court: REP
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER] JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . COME NOW, Plaintiff, KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez and Defendants, COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY JASON AYALA an DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, who have met and conferred through their respective attorneys of record, and now make this joint stipulated request of the Court: REPR..
More
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; [PROPOSED ORDER]
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
COME NOW, Plaintiff, KEANU ETHAN CAMPOS, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Deniz Gonzalez and Defendants, COUNTY OF KERN, DEPUTY JASON AYALA an DEPUTY JOSHUA BATHE, who have met and conferred through their respective attorneys of record, and now make this joint stipulated request of the Court:
REPRESENTATIONS AND JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST:
1. The Mandatory Settlement Conference ("MSC") in this matter is currently set before Magistrate Judge, Jennifer L. Thurston, on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.;
2. Defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment ("MSJ") as to all claims. The motion has been briefed and argued. The Court took the matter under submission on March 15, 2016, and thereafter requested supplemental briefing from the parties which was completed on March 31, 2016.
3. On May 17, 2016, the Court vacated the trial and pretrial dates, because of the pending MSJ which had not been ruled upon (Docket #56). The Court also continued the MSC to June 28, 2016. At the present time, there has still been no ruling yet on the MSJ from the Court.
4. Plaintiff and Defendants have timely exchanged settlement demands and offers, but believe that a settlement conference, prior to the resolution of the issues raised in the MSJ, will not be productive and therefore, the case currently is not postured for meaningful negotiations or potential settlement;
5. Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendants mutually invoke the provision made in the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 26, p. 6, Section X, fn. 3) and stipulate that the Court continue the MSC set for June 28, 2016 to a date/time convenient to the Court which is approximately 60 days out from the current date.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
For GOOD CAUSE shown, and based upon the stipulation of the, the Court ORDERS:
1. The settlement conference, currently set on June 28, 2016 at 1:30 p.m., is CONTINUED to August 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
