Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DUNCAN v. SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY, 2:16-cv-00293-TLN-KJN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160627496 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, by stipulation, agreed that Defendant be given an extension of time up to and including July 1, 2016 to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Defendant has indicated its intention to file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. The parties have stipulated to a
More

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiff Theo Duncan and Defendant The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, by stipulation, agreed that Defendant be given an extension of time up to and including July 1, 2016 to move or plead in response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Defendant has indicated its intention to file a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. The parties have stipulated to a briefing schedule extending Plaintiff's deadline for filing an opposition to the motion to dismiss and extending Defendant's deadline for filing a reply to Plaintiff's opposition.

Upon consideration of the stipulation filed by the parties, Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is extended to July 1, 2016, Plaintiff's deadline to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss is extended to August 1, 2016, and Defendant's deadline to file a reply to Plaintiff's opposition is extended to August 22, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer