Filed: Jun. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney, Kathleen A. Servatius, counsel for plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender, Victor M. Chavez, counsel for defendant RODRIGO CONTRERAS-RAMOS, that the change of plea hearing now set for July 5, 2016 be continued to August 1, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Defense counsel proposes th
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING; ORDER LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney, Kathleen A. Servatius, counsel for plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender, Victor M. Chavez, counsel for defendant RODRIGO CONTRERAS-RAMOS, that the change of plea hearing now set for July 5, 2016 be continued to August 1, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Defense counsel proposes thi..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CHANGE OF PLEA HEARING; ORDER
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel, Assistant United States Attorney, Kathleen A. Servatius, counsel for plaintiff, and Assistant Federal Defender, Victor M. Chavez, counsel for defendant RODRIGO CONTRERAS-RAMOS, that the change of plea hearing now set for July 5, 2016 be continued to August 1, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.
Defense counsel proposes this stipulation because he will be out of the office on July 5, 2016 and needs additional time to finalize the plea agreement. In addition, because Mr. Contreras comes from Barstow it is requested that his matter be set for 10:00 a.m.
The parties agree that the delay resulting from the requested continuance shall be excluded as necessary for effective defense preparation and continued plea negotiations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv). For this reason, the ends of justice served by the granting of the requested continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
