Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PORRECA v. FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, 1:15-cv-00732-DAD-MJS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160628a47 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS' PERSONAL APPEARANCE ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE THIS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc., are to appear personally at the continued hearing on their counsel's motion to withdraw on Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:30 P.M. in Courtroom 5 of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, California and to show cause why th
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS' PERSONAL APPEARANCE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE THIS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF

It is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc., are to appear personally at the continued hearing on their counsel's motion to withdraw on Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 1:30 P.M. in Courtroom 5 of the Robert E. Coyle United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare St., Fresno, California and to show cause why that motion should not be granted. In the alternative plaintiffs Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc. may appear telephonically, but must contact plaintiffs' counsel, Matthew Mellen, to coordinate a telephonic appearance no later than Thursday, June 30, 2016, in order to do so.

The Clerk of Court is directed to serve this order on plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc. personally by mail at the below addresses which have been provided by their counsel:

Arturo Gonzalez Gonzalez and Son, Inc. 5827 Herma Street San Jose, CA 95123

If plaintiffs Arturo Gonzalez and Gonzalez and Son, Inc. no longer wish to pursue this action but rather wish to be dismissed as plaintiffs, they may advise the court of that desire. If not, however, they must appear as ordered. Any failure on their part to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action as to them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer