Anderson v. Colvin, 2:15-cv-01954-AC. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160630a18
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Fed.R.Civ.P. 6] ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff requests an extension of twenty-one (21) days for all deadlines in this case. Plaintiff's counsel asserts that the complexity of the case and extensive administrative record evaluation has become more problematical than originally expected necessitating additional time to draft and file a motion for summary judgment. The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME [Fed.R.Civ.P. 6] ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff requests an extension of twenty-one (21) days for all deadlines in this case. Plaintiff's counsel asserts that the complexity of the case and extensive administrative record evaluation has become more problematical than originally expected necessitating additional time to draft and file a motion for summary judgment. The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
[Fed.R.Civ.P. 6]
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff requests an extension of twenty-one (21) days for all deadlines in this case. Plaintiff's counsel asserts that the complexity of the case and extensive administrative record evaluation has become more problematical than originally expected necessitating additional time to draft and file a motion for summary judgment.
The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.
Defendant does not object to allowing Plaintiff the additional time to draft her motion for summary judgment and, subject to the Court's approval, stipulates to twenty-one (21) days extension of time to allow Plaintiff to file her motion for summary judgment in this action. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment or remand is now due on July 18, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for additional time.
SO ORDERED:
DECLARATION OF CONCURRENCE OF SIGNATURE
GENERAL ORDER 131, X
I, Robert C. Weems, hereby declare and attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories, or from the single signatory (in the case, e.g., of a declaration) whose signature is indicated by the notation " /s/ [name of signatory]."1
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
/s/Robert C. Weems
_________________________
Robert C. Weems
FootNotes
1. The filer shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any) unless filer has attached a scanned image of the signature page(s) of the document being electronically filed in lieu of maintaining the paper record for subsequent production if required.
Source: Leagle
