Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carlin v. Dairy America, Inc., 1:09 CV 00430-AWI. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160708811 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to Rule 6-143 of the General Local Rules of the above titled Court, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants DairyAmerica, Inc. ("DairyAmerica") and California Dairies, Inc. ("California Dairies") (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, (collective
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Rule 6-143 of the General Local Rules of the above titled Court, Plaintiffs, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendants DairyAmerica, Inc. ("DairyAmerica") and California Dairies, Inc. ("California Dairies") (collectively, "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, (collectively, the "Parties") hereby stipulate to the following:

RECITALS

Whereas Plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Complaint on February 10, 2016;

Whereas Defendants filed concurrent Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), on March 30, 2016;

Whereas the Court filed its Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss on May 2, 2016;

Whereas Defendants filed concurrent Motions for Reconsideration of the Order on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss on May 16, 2016;

Whereas the Court filed an Order denying Defendants' Motions for Reconsideration on June 23, 2016;

Whereas, following the Court's Order denying Defendants' Motions for Reconsideration, the deadline for Defendants to each respond to the Third Amended Complaint was July 7, 2016;

Whereas, given the intervening national holiday and the complexity and length of Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint, Defendants sought an extension of time to respond thereto;

Whereas, Plaintiffs have agreed to provide Defendants with an extension to the deadline to respond to the Third Amended Complaint.

STIPULATION

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendants to respond to the Third Amended Complaint shall be extended by 11 days, up to and including July 18, 2016;

2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The Court adopts the Parties' stipulation as follows:

1. The deadline for Defendants to each respond to the Third Amended Complaint shall be extended by 11 days, up to and including July 18, 2016;

2. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer