Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mora v. Zeta Interactive Corp., 1:16-cv-00198-DAD-SAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160712670 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Sergio Mora ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Zeta Interactive Corp and David A. Steinberg (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on May 3, 2016, the Court issued a Phase One Scheduling Order relating to arbitration. (Dkt. 20). WHEREAS, the parties are ordered to complete all discovery relating to arbitration on or before
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE

Plaintiff Sergio Mora ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Zeta Interactive Corp and David A. Steinberg (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 3, 2016, the Court issued a Phase One Scheduling Order relating to arbitration. (Dkt. 20).

WHEREAS, the parties are ordered to complete all discovery relating to arbitration on or before July 22, 2016.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel and Defendants' counsel have noticed depositions and to accommodate the schedules of the parties and their counsel, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court's approval, to extend the discovery cut-off date one week to July 29, 2016.

Now, therefore, the parties, through the undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. The discovery cut-off date relating to arbitration, currently set for July 22, 2016, shall be extended to July 29, 2016.

2. All other dates issued in the Phase One Scheduling Order shall remain unchanged. Respectfully submitted,

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby orders:

1. The discovery cut-off date relating to arbitration, currently set for July 22, 2016, shall be extended to July 29, 2016.

2. All other dates issued in the Phase One Scheduling Order shall remain unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer