Braswell v. Colvin, 2:15-cv-2672-EFB. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160712703
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended by 30 days, from July 5, 2016 until August 4, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because a
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended by 30 days, from July 5, 2016 until August 4, 2016. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because ad..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment will be extended by 30 days, from July 5, 2016 until August 4, 2016.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's motion. Defendant respectfully requests this additional time because additional time is needed respond to Plaintiff's motion.
The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order (Dkt No. 5) shall be modified accordingly.
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
