REHANA v. COLVIN, 2:16-cv-00006-EFB. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160712708
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 5, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accord
Summary: STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 5, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accorda..
More
STIPULATION FOR FIRST 30 DAY EXTENSION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Summary Judgment/Remand be extended thirty (30) days until August 5, 2016. This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension of time. Despite due diligence, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to prepare Plaintiff's opening brief in accordance with the current scheduling order due to counsel's current workload which has involved conflicting deadlines in unrelated matters
SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
