Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BASILIO v. CITY OF FAIRFIELD, 2:16-cv-00392-JAM-EFB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160718816 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . Plaintiff JESUS BETANZO BASILIO and Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CITY OF FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 1 , WALT TIBBET (hereinafter "DEFENDANTS"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby represent to the Court as follows: The parties filed a Joint Status Report Pursuant to Standing Order on June 3, 2016. In it, Plaintiffs requested that parties exchange Rule 26 initial discl
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE RULE 26 INITIAL DISCLOSURES

Plaintiff JESUS BETANZO BASILIO and Defendants CITY OF FAIRFIELD, CITY OF FAIRFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT1, WALT TIBBET (hereinafter "DEFENDANTS"), by and through their counsel of record, hereby represent to the Court as follows:

The parties filed a Joint Status Report Pursuant to Standing Order on June 3, 2016. In it, Plaintiffs requested that parties exchange Rule 26 initial disclosures on July 15, 2016 and Defendants proposed to exchange disclosures per the default deadlines of the Federal Rules.

Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on April 11, 2016. That Motion was set for hearing on June 14, 2016, but the matter was ordered submitted without argument on June 13, 2016. No Order on that Motion has been issued and no Case Management Conference is on calendar.

Because the pleadings in this case are not yet settled, the parties therefore stipulate and request that the deadline to exchange Rule 26 initial disclosures be set for 30 days after receiving a decision on Defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss.

ELECTRONIC CASE FILING ATTESTATION

I, Parry A. Black, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing documents. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 131(e), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from each of its Signatories.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Fairfield Police Department is a department of the CITY OF FAIRFIELD and is not a separate legal entity. The CITY thus stipulates on behalf of the "Fairfield Police Department".
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer