Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mercado v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 1:16-cv-00561-LJO-JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160720748
Filed: Jul. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING BINDING ARBITRATION (Doc. 10) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . RECITALS WHEREAS, Plaintiffs David Sandoval Mercado and William Chenoweth (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint in this action on April 20, 2016, against Defendant Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. ("Defendant"); WHEREAS, the claims alleged by Plaintiffs in their Complaint arise out of their employment relationship with Defendant; WHERE
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY ALL PROCEEDINGS PENDING BINDING ARBITRATION

(Doc. 10)

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs David Sandoval Mercado and William Chenoweth (collectively, "Plaintiffs") filed a Complaint in this action on April 20, 2016, against Defendant Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. ("Defendant");

WHEREAS, the claims alleged by Plaintiffs in their Complaint arise out of their employment relationship with Defendant;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs agreed as a term and condition of their employment that all claims arising out of their employment relationship with Defendant must be submitted to binding arbitration in accordance with the terms of the Halliburton Company Dispute Resolution Program ("Halliburton DRP");

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, Plaintiff Chenoweth submitted a Demand for Arbitration to JAMS, Defendant responded on July 7, 2016, and an arbitrator was appointed on July 12, 2016, and a telephone conference to set an arbitration date is set for July 25, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Mercado agrees all of his claims in this litigation are subject to binding arbitration in accordance with the Halliburton DRP and will submit a Demand for Arbitration to either JAMS or AAA on or before August 1, 2016;

WHEREAS, prior to binding arbitration, the Parties may elect to voluntarily attend mediation; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree that proceedings in this Court shall be stayed pending the completion of mediation and/or binding arbitration. The Parties further agree that this Court shall retain jurisdiction to confirm the arbitration award, if any, and to enter judgment, if any, for the purposes of enforcement.

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. All claims asserted by Plaintiff Chenoweth in this litigation will be resolved in the JAMS arbitration proceeding he initiated with his Demand for Arbitration dated June 16, 2016;

2. Plaintiff Mercado will submit all of his claims in this litigation to binding arbitration pursuant to the terms of the Halliburton DRP;

3. Plaintiff Mercado will make a Demand for Arbitration to either JAMS or AAA prior to August 1, 2016;

4. The Parties may elect to voluntarily attend mediation prior to binding arbitration;

5. All proceedings in this Court shall be stayed to allow the completion of mediation and if necessary, binding arbitration; and

6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to confirm the arbitration award, if any, and enter judgment, if any, for the purposes of enforcement.

IT IS SO STIPULATED. WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC

Filer's Attestation-Local Rule 131(e)

The filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document and its content from the signatories to this document.

ORDER

1. The stipulation of the parties to remand this matter to arbitration is GRANTED;

2. The Scheduling Conference set for July 21, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. is vacated;

3. The matter is STAYED1 to allow the completion of the arbitration; and

4. Every 120 days and no later than 30 days after the issuance of the arbitrator's decision, counsel SHALL file a joint status report; and

5. The Court retains jurisdiction to confirm the arbitration award and enter judgment for purposes of enforcement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The FAA provides, "If any suit or proceeding be brought in any of the courts of the United States upon any issue referable to arbitration under an agreement in writing for such arbitration, the court in which such suit is pending, upon being satisfied that the issue involved in such suit or proceeding is referable to arbitration under such an agreement, shall on application of one of the parties stay the trial of the action until such arbitration has been had in accordance with the terms of the agreement . . ." 9 U.S.C § 3.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer