Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

VARGAS v. J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC., 1:15-cv-00177 JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160728858 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER TO DISMISS (Doc. 26) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, VIRGINIA VARGAS and Defendant, J.C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC., ("Defendant") by and through their respective counsel of record, that the action styled "VARGAS v. J.C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC., et al" (Case No. 1:15-CV-00177-LJO JLT), that this Court may dismiss Plaintiff VIRGINIA VARGAS' Complaint, with prejud
More

STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER TO DISMISS (Doc. 26)

STIPULATION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, VIRGINIA VARGAS and Defendant, J.C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC., ("Defendant") by and through their respective counsel of record, that the action styled "VARGAS v. J.C. PENNY CORPORATION, INC., et al" (Case No. 1:15-CV-00177-LJO JLT), that this Court may dismiss Plaintiff VIRGINIA VARGAS' Complaint, with prejudice, pursuant to the provisions of FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii), which dismissal with prejudice is herein requested.

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

Based upon the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint, Virginia Vargas v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Case No.: 1:15-cv-00177-LJO-JLT, is DISMISSED with Prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer