U.S. v. McCree, 2:12-CR-279 TLN. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160728888
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Todd A. Pickles, and Defendant Michael McCree by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on July 28, 2016. The government has provided a proposed written plea agreement to resol
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Todd A. Pickles, and Defendant Michael McCree by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows: 1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on July 28, 2016. The government has provided a proposed written plea agreement to resolv..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The parties to this action, Plaintiff United States of America by and through Assistant United States Attorney Todd A. Pickles, and Defendant Michael McCree by and through his attorney Todd D. Leras, stipulate as follows:
1. This matter is presently set for a status conference on July 28, 2016. The government has provided a proposed written plea agreement to resolve the matter through negotiated disposition.
2. Defense counsel has reviewed the proposed Plea Agreement with Mr. McCree. Additional investigation is needed to resolve questions related to potential defenses and sentencing factors. The defense believes that these matters must be completed before a decision can be finalized regarding acceptance or rejection of the proposed resolution.
3. Counsel for Defendant believes that failure to grant additional time as requested would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
4. Based on the above-stated facts, the parties jointly request that the Court find that the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a trial within the time prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
5. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of July 28, 2016 to August 18, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), and (B) (iv) [Local Code T-4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at Defendant's request on the basis that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial.
6. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Pickles has reviewed this proposed order and authorized Todd Leras to sign it on his behalf.
By Todd D. Leras for
_____________________
TODD A. PICKLES
Assistant United States Attorney
ORDER
BASED ON THE REPRESENTATIONS AND STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, it is hereby ordered that the status conference in this matter scheduled for July 28, 2016, is vacated. A new status conference is scheduled for August 18, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. The Court further finds, based on the representations of the parties and Defendant's request, that the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time shall be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow necessary attorney preparation taking into consideration the exercise of due diligence for the period from July 28, 2016, up to and including August 18, 2016.
Source: Leagle
