Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MITCHELL v. U.S., 2:06-CR-00078-WBS-KJN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160729783 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, the government was to file its opposition to defendant's petition under 28 U.S.C. 2255 no later than 7/22/2016. Petitioner was then to file a reply no later than 8/5/2016. 2. By this st
More

STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, the government was to file its opposition to defendant's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 no later than 7/22/2016. Petitioner was then to file a reply no later than 8/5/2016.

2. By this stipulation, the parties now jointly move to amend the briefing schedule such that the government may file its opposition no later than 8/5/2016, while Petitioner may file any reply no later than 8/19/2016.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find, that the proposed amended briefing schedule is fair and will not significantly prejudice either party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States shall file its opposition to petitioner's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 no later than 8/5/2016. Petitioner may file any reply no later than 8/19/2016.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer