Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Van Dyck, 2:15-CR-00200 GEB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160801598 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2016
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION RE: RESTITUTION; ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , District Judge . The United States, through the undersigned counsel, and defendant Neil A. Van Dyck, through his undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and jointly request that, pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. 3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii), restitution be ordered payable to the following entities in the following amounts and that the judgment in this case be amended accordingly. Entity
More

AMENDED STIPULATION RE: RESTITUTION; ORDER

The United States, through the undersigned counsel, and defendant Neil A. Van Dyck, through his undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and jointly request that, pursuant to the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii), restitution be ordered payable to the following entities in the following amounts and that the judgment in this case be amended accordingly.

Entity Amount 1. Medicare $954,142.11 2. Tricare $62,418.01 3. Aetna $13,589.40 4. Anthem $89,928.98 5. Blue Shield $40,567.87 6. Cigna East $175.21 7. Cigna West $31.18 8. Coventry $1,843.37 9. HealthNet $1,954.17 10. HealthSmart $79.00 11. Humana $1,982.89 $1,166,712.19 (Total)

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the parties Stipulation re: Restitution. Having read and considered the papers, and being fully informed, the Court ADOPTS the stipulation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the defendant Neil Van Dyck shall pay restitution to the entities in the amounts as set forth in the parties' stipulation and that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the judgment accordingly. The matter is closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer