Filed: Aug. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michele M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Jeremy Warren, John R. Manning, Esq., hereby stipulate the following: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on August 5, 2016. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michele M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Jeremy Warren, John R. Manning, Esq., hereby stipulate the following: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on August 5, 2016. 2. By this stipulation, the defendant ..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.
The United States of America through its undersigned counsel, Michele M. Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Jeremy Warren, John R. Manning, Esq., hereby stipulate the following:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status conference on August 5, 2016.
2. By this stipulation, the defendant now moves to continue the status conference until September 2, 2016 and to exclude time between August 5, 2016 and September 2, 2016 under the Local CodeT-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare). The parties agree and stipulate, and request the Court find the following:
a. Counsel for the defendant was appointed on June 17, 2016.
b. The government has produced approximately 1,300 pages of discovery and 26 audio files.
c. Counsel for the defendant needs additional time to review the discovery, conduct investigation, interview potential witnesses, and meet with the defendant.
d. Counsel for the defendant believes the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
e. The Government does not object to the continuance.
f. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
g. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A) within which trial must commence, the time period of August 5, 2016 to September 2, 2016, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 United States Code Section 3161(h)(7)(A)) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
3. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
