Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BEALL, 2:16-cr-107-MCE. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160809711 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting United States Attorney, through Ross K. Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Lexi P. Negin, attorney for Richard J. Beall that the status conference scheduled for August 11, 2016 be v
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting United States Attorney, through Ross K. Naughton, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Lexi P. Negin, attorney for Richard J. Beall that the status conference scheduled for August 11, 2016 be vacated and continued to September 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.

Defense counsel for Mr. Beall requires additional time to review the discovery, to conduct additional investigation and legal research, and to confer with his client about plea negotiations and how to proceed in this case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as August 3, 2016, the date of the parties' stipulation, through and including September 29, 2016; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon defense counsel's preparation.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court further finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

Time from August 3, 2016, the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including September 29, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4) [defense counsel's preparation]. It is further ordered the August 11, 2016 status conference shall be continued until September 29, 2016, at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer