Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MIGUEL, 1:16-MC-00038-LJO-EPG (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160812858 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2016
Summary: FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT (Doc. 10) LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Upon a review of the United States' Application for a Writ of Garnishment, as well as its request for Findings and Recommendations for a Final Order of Garnishment (Doc. 10), 1 the Court finds as follows: 1. On August 26, 1996, the Court convicted and sentenced Defendant Irma Miguel in criminal case number 1:96-cr-5110-REC. The Judgment ordered that Defendant pay a $50.00 special assessment and $224,655.62
More

FINAL ORDER OF GARNISHMENT

(Doc. 10)

Upon a review of the United States' Application for a Writ of Garnishment, as well as its request for Findings and Recommendations for a Final Order of Garnishment (Doc. 10),1 the Court finds as follows:

1. On August 26, 1996, the Court convicted and sentenced Defendant Irma Miguel in criminal case number 1:96-cr-5110-REC. The Judgment ordered that Defendant pay a $50.00 special assessment and $224,655.62 in restitution. See, U.S.A. v. Miguel, 1:96CR05110-REC (Docs. 5 & 6).

2. To collect the restitution order, the United States filed an Application for Writ of Garnishment on June 24, 2016 in the instant case. (Doc. 3).

3. As of June 22, 2016, Irma Miguel owed $225,311.61 in restitution. (Doc. 3, pg. 2, lines 6-11).

4. The Clerk issued a Writ of Garnishment, as well as the Clerk's Notice and Instructions to Judgment Debtor on June 24, 2016. (Doc. 4 & 5).

5. On June 24, 2016, the United States served the Garnishee and Judgment Debtor with a copy of the Writ of Garnishment and its attachments. The Judgment Debtor was notified of her right to a hearing and object to the Answer and/or to claim exemptions. (Doc. 6). Specifically, the Notice advised the Judgement Debtor that she had twenty days (20) days from the date the garnishee served its Answer to file a request for hearing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(5), and/or to assert a claim of exemption.

6. Garnishee, Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Association, served its Acknowledgment of Service and Answer of Garnishee (the "Answer") to the writ on June 29, 2016. In its Answer, the garnishee identifies that the Judgment Debtor has an account that is in the custody, possession and/or control of Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Association. The Answer states that the Defined Benefit Plan has an approximate value of $73,383.54 and 100% of the account is comprised of Employee Contributions. (Doc. 7).

7. No request for hearing was filed, and no claims of exemptions were raised by the Judgment Debtor, as set forth in 28 U.S.C. §3014(b)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The United States' request for a Final Order of Garnishment is GRANTED.

2. GARNISHEE, shall DELIVER, within fifteen (15) days of the filing of the Order, the full value, from Irma Miguel's Defined Benefit Plan retirement account. Payment must be made in the form a cashier's check, money order or company draft, and made payable to the "Clerk of the Court," and shall be mailed to the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, 501 I Street, Room 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814. Stanislaus County Employees Retirement Association shall also state the criminal docket number (Case No. 1:96CR05110-REC) on the payment instrument.

3. That upon payment and processing of the garnished funds being applied towards restitution, the writ of garnishment shall TERMINATE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(B).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. A Final Order of Garnishment rather than Findings and Recommendations is issued in this case since the Judgment Debtor did not request a hearing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer