U.S. v. DUONG AI NGO, 2:13-CR-229 MCE. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160812882
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in Defendant's Request to Seal, it is hereby ordered that Defendant Duong Ai Ngo's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report and Sentencing Position and his Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant. The Court has considere
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in Defendant's Request to Seal, it is hereby ordered that Defendant Duong Ai Ngo's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report and Sentencing Position and his Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant. The Court has considered..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 141(b) and based upon the representation contained in Defendant's Request to Seal, it is hereby ordered that Defendant Duong Ai Ngo's Motion to Correct the Presentence Report and Sentencing Position and his Request to Seal shall be SEALED until further order of this Court. It is further ordered that access to the sealed documents shall be limited to the government and counsel for the defendant.
The Court has considered the factors set forth in Oregonian Publishing Co. v. U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, 920 F.2d 1462 (9th Cir. 1990). The Court finds that, for the reasons stated in Defendant's request, sealing the Defendant's motion serves a compelling interest. The Court further finds that, in the absence of closure, the compelling interests identified by the Defendant would be harmed. In light of the public filing of its request to seal, the Court further finds that there are no additional alternatives to sealing Defendant's motion that would adequately protect the compelling interests identified by the Government.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
