LANINI v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 2:13-cv-00027-KJM-EFB. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160812884
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 11, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2016
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On August 1, 2016, the court issued an order denying the plaintiffs' request for relief from deadlines imposed by the court's pretrial scheduling order. ECF No. 87. On August 9, 2016, the plaintiffs filed "objections" to this order, requesting reconsideration. ECF No. 89. All motions must be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned judge or magistrate judge. E.D. Cal. 230(b). If necessary, a party may obtain expedited relief by filing an
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , District Judge . On August 1, 2016, the court issued an order denying the plaintiffs' request for relief from deadlines imposed by the court's pretrial scheduling order. ECF No. 87. On August 9, 2016, the plaintiffs filed "objections" to this order, requesting reconsideration. ECF No. 89. All motions must be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned judge or magistrate judge. E.D. Cal. 230(b). If necessary, a party may obtain expedited relief by filing an e..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On August 1, 2016, the court issued an order denying the plaintiffs' request for relief from deadlines imposed by the court's pretrial scheduling order. ECF No. 87. On August 9, 2016, the plaintiffs filed "objections" to this order, requesting reconsideration. ECF No. 89.
All motions must be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned judge or magistrate judge. E.D. Cal. 230(b). If necessary, a party may obtain expedited relief by filing an ex parte application. See generally Mission Power Eng'g Co. v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 883 F.Supp. 488 (C.D. Cal. 1995); see also Standing Order 5, ECF No. 5-1 (listing requirements for ex parte applications).
The plaintiffs' request for reconsideration was not set for a hearing on the court's civil law and motion calendar, was not accompanied by an explanation for why emergency or expedited relief is necessary, and does not comply with the provisions of this court's standing order. Within seven days, the plaintiffs shall give notice of a hearing date or file an amended request for reconsideration, or the request for reconsideration will be denied summarily.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle