Filed: Aug. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On July 8, 2016, the court held the mid-discovery status conference in case number 1:15-cv-01637. At this conference, counsel agreed they would "continue to meet and confer related to the plaintiff's production request for peace officer personnel records. If requested, the Court will conduct an in-camera review of the records to determine which records, if any, will be produced." (Doc. 27 at 2) The defendants have produ
Summary: ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On July 8, 2016, the court held the mid-discovery status conference in case number 1:15-cv-01637. At this conference, counsel agreed they would "continue to meet and confer related to the plaintiff's production request for peace officer personnel records. If requested, the Court will conduct an in-camera review of the records to determine which records, if any, will be produced." (Doc. 27 at 2) The defendants have produc..
More
ORDER AFTER IN CAMERA REVIEW
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On July 8, 2016, the court held the mid-discovery status conference in case number 1:15-cv-01637. At this conference, counsel agreed they would "continue to meet and confer related to the plaintiff's production request for peace officer personnel records. If requested, the Court will conduct an in-camera review of the records to determine which records, if any, will be produced." (Doc. 27 at 2)
The defendants have produced documents to the Court for in camera review. The Court has conducted the in camera review of two investigations (in redacted form) of two claims of a sexual nature made by juvenile wards against probation officers while the wards were in custody. The court finds both investigations should be produced. The Court makes no comment or finding about the admissibility of these documents at trial. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. Within three court days, copies of the records (with Bates numbers added) of the two investigations1 SHALL be produced to counsel for the plaintiffs in both cases captioned above
2. No later than August 16, 2016, the defendants SHALL retrieve the documents that were subject to the in camera review, from the Clerk of the Court, at the United States Courthouse located at 510 19th Street, Suite 200, Bakersfield, CA.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
