Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Sharp, 1:15-MJ-191-SAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160816602 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2016
Summary: UNITED STATES' MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Background STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . In October 2015, the parties entered into an "Agreement Re Deferred Entry of Judgment" (the "Agreement"). The Agreement obligated the defendant to plead guilty and to perform the following: (1) pay restitution in the amount of $1,100, (2) pay a $10 special assessment; (3) complete 100 hours of community service; and (4) obey all laws. In exchange for the defendant's performance of all condition
More

UNITED STATES' MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSALBackground

In October 2015, the parties entered into an "Agreement Re Deferred Entry of Judgment" (the "Agreement"). The Agreement obligated the defendant to plead guilty and to perform the following: (1) pay restitution in the amount of $1,100, (2) pay a $10 special assessment; (3) complete 100 hours of community service; and (4) obey all laws. In exchange for the defendant's performance of all conditions, the United States agreed to move the Court to allow the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea and to dismiss the charges with prejudice. At the resulting guilty plea hearing on October 15, 2015, the Court set a review hearing for August 4, 2016.

Prior to the review hearing, counsel for the United States confirmed that the defendant had complied with each of the obligations, and at the hearing, it moved for withdrawal of guilty plea and for dismissal. The Court granted each motion, and directed the United States to prepare an order reflecting these actions.

Motion

The United States therefore moves the Court to order:

1) That the Defendant's Plea of Guilty be VACATED; and 2) That all charges in this case, as reflected on Violation Notice F4284111, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

Order

The Court hereby orders:

1) That the Defendant's Plea of Guilty be VACATED; and 2) That all charges in this case, as reflected on Violation Notice F4284111, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer