Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DEDMAN v. FOROUZANFAR, 1:16-cv-00799 LJO JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160819714 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC EXTENTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. 12, 13) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . The parties have agreed to allow the defendants until August 19, 2016 to file their answers. (Docs. 12, 13) However, the defendants have already filed their answers. (Docs. 14, 15) Thus, the requests for the extensions of time are GRANTED nunc pro tunc. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO TUNC EXTENTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. 12, 13)

The parties have agreed to allow the defendants until August 19, 2016 to file their answers. (Docs. 12, 13) However, the defendants have already filed their answers. (Docs. 14, 15) Thus, the requests for the extensions of time are GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer