Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARLICK v. COUNTY OF KERN, 1:13-cv-01051-LJO-JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160823555 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE COMPROMISE ON BEHALF OF MINOR PLAINTIFF J.S. LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . This matter arises out of the death of David Silva which, it is claimed, was caused by the application of excessive and unreasonable use of force by various law enforcement officers. Minor Plaintiff J.S. is a surviving child of the decedent, and seeks approval of the settlement reached with Defendants, by and through her m
More

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING APPROVAL OF THE COMPROMISE ON BEHALF OF MINOR PLAINTIFF J.S.

This matter arises out of the death of David Silva which, it is claimed, was caused by the application of excessive and unreasonable use of force by various law enforcement officers. Minor Plaintiff J.S. is a surviving child of the decedent, and seeks approval of the settlement reached with Defendants, by and through her mother and guardian ad litem Adriane Dominguez. (Doc. 248) On August 2, 2016, the magistrate judge recommended the settlement be approved, and the funds distributed as proposed by the parties. (Doc. 251)

The parties were given fourteen days to file any objections to the recommendation. (Doc. 251 at 6) In addition, the parties were "advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order." (Id., citing Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)). To date, no objections have been filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Britt v. Simi Valley United School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983), this Court conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Findings and Recommendations dated August 2, 2016 (Doc. 251) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The petitions to approve settlement of the J.S. claims (Docs. 239, 248) are GRANTED; 3. The County of Kern is DIRECTED to pay $158,400 to "ADRIANE DOMINGUEZ, as the Guardian Ad Litem for JADE SILVA, a minor, in trust to the Law Office of John L. Burris"; 4. The State of California be DIRECTED to pay $21,600 to "ADRIANE DOMINGUEZ, as the Guardian Ad Litem for JADE SILVA, a minor, in trust to the Law Office of John L. Burris"; 5. The request for attorneys' fees in the amount of $45,000 and costs (in the amount of $2,866.30), is APPROVED; 6. Of the settlement amount, $10,695.98 SHALL be disbursed immediately by the Law Office of John Burris to Adriane Dominguez to pay for ballet lessons, a laptop computer and orthodontia services for the child. The remainder of the settlement proceeds, $121,437.72, SHALL be placed in an interest-bearing blocked trust account at an FDIC insured banking institution for the benefit of J.S. This amount will be disbursed to J.S. on her 18th birthday; and 7. The parties SHALL file a stipulation for dismissal of the action with prejudice, and lodge a separate order, within ten days of the date of service of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer