U.S. v. BLAKE, 2:03-CR-00371-MCE-EFP P (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160825901
Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONSOLIDATION AND EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . For the foregoing reasons and good cause having been shown, in the Government's Motion to File a Consolidated Response to Defendants Blake, Williams, Maddox, Slater, and Arceneaux's section 2255 petitions is GRANTED. 1 Furthermore, the Government's requests for an extension of time to file its answering brief is GRANTED. The Government's Answering Brief is now due on October 17, 2016. F
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONSOLIDATION AND EXTENSION OF TIME EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . For the foregoing reasons and good cause having been shown, in the Government's Motion to File a Consolidated Response to Defendants Blake, Williams, Maddox, Slater, and Arceneaux's section 2255 petitions is GRANTED. 1 Furthermore, the Government's requests for an extension of time to file its answering brief is GRANTED. The Government's Answering Brief is now due on October 17, 2016. Fo..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONSOLIDATION AND EXTENSION OF TIME
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
For the foregoing reasons and good cause having been shown, in the Government's Motion to File a Consolidated Response to Defendants Blake, Williams, Maddox, Slater, and Arceneaux's section 2255 petitions is GRANTED.1 Furthermore, the Government's requests for an extension of time to file its answering brief is GRANTED. The Government's Answering Brief is now due on October 17, 2016.
FootNotes
1. With respect to defendant Arceneaux, the government shall respond to the second amended § 2255 motion, filed August 22, 2016 (ECF No. 1045).
Source: Leagle
