Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. v. VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC., CIV. 2-00-113 MCE-DB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160830847 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . Plaintiff AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. ("AmeriPride") and Defendant TEXAS EASTERN OVERSEAS, INC. ("TEO"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to amend their Exhibit Lists, as follows: RECITALS 1. On July 26, 2016 AmeriPride and TEO filed their Joint Pretrial Statement. ECF No. 1050. 2. Pursuant to the requirements of the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, ECF No. 988, the Joint
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND JOINT PRETRIAL STATEMENT

Plaintiff AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. ("AmeriPride") and Defendant TEXAS EASTERN OVERSEAS, INC. ("TEO"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to amend their Exhibit Lists, as follows:

RECITALS

1. On July 26, 2016 AmeriPride and TEO filed their Joint Pretrial Statement. ECF No. 1050.

2. Pursuant to the requirements of the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, ECF No. 988, the Joint Pretrial Statement includes AmeriPride's list of exhibits AmeriPride expects to offer, if necessary, at trial, and TEO's list of exhibits TEO expects to offer at trial. ECF No. 1050 at 78-94 and 104-191.

3. Since filing the Joint Pretrial Statement, AmeriPride and TEO have met and conferred in order to reduce the number of potential exhibits that may be offered at trial.

4. The Parties agree that reducing the number of potential exhibits that may be offered at trial will streamline the presentation of evidence at trial, and allow for a more efficient trial.

5. The Parties respectfully request the Court to allow AmeriPride and TEO each to replace the exhibit lists filed with the Joint Pretrial Statement with the amended exhibit lists attached hereto as Attachment 1 and Attachment 2.

6. Pursuant to the requirements of the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, ECF No. 988, the Joint Pretrial Statement includes undisputed and disputed facts identified as relevant by the Parties. ECF No. 1050 at 12-26 (Undisputed Facts) and 27-44 (Disputed Facts).

7. After meeting and conferring, the Parties agree that Undisputed Fact No. 143 should be revised in the Final Pretrial Order as follows:

a. "The January 19, 2015 Map prepared by Burns & McDonnell, bearing bates stamp number AM061842, as annotated by TEO's expert Gary Hokkanen, and entered as Exhibit 95 to his January 20, 2016 deposition is an accurate representation of the locations of buildings, water supply wells, monitoring wells, remediation wells, other samplings, and other relevant structures or locations. Deposition Exhibit 95 is attached hereto as Appendix 4."

8. After meeting and conferring, the Parties agree that certain Disputed Facts are not genuinely in dispute, and should be listed as Undisputed Facts as follows:

a. Disputed Facts Nos. 2, 7-13, 54, 84, and 90 are not genuinely in dispute.

9. Good cause exists for the Court to grant the Parties' request because it will

(1) facilitate a more efficient trial; (2) encourage efficient pre-trial activities between the Parties; (3) will not prejudice the Parties or the Court and will not delay the case; and, (4) will not alter or affect the Parties' compliance with any other requirements in the Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, ECF No. 988.

STIPULATION

Based on the foregoing, the Parties stipulate as follows:

1. AmeriPride respectfully requests the Court replace the exhibit list filed with the Joint Pretrial Statement at ECF No. 1050 at 78-94 with the exhibit list attached hereto as Attachment 1.

2. TEO respectfully requests the Court replace the exhibit list filed with the Joint Pretrial Statement at ECF No. 1050 at 104-191 with the exhibit list attached hereto as Attachment 2.

3. The Parties respectfully request the Court include the exhibit lists attached hereto as Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 as part of the Court's Final Pretrial Order in lieu of the exhibit lists filed on July 25, 2016 with the Joint Pretrial Statement.

4. The Parties respectfully request the Court revise Undisputed Fact No. 143 in the Final Pretrial Order to read as follows: "The January 19, 2015 Map prepared by Burns & McDonnell, bearing bates stamp number AM061842, as annotated by TEO's expert Gary Hokkanen, and entered as Exhibit 95 to his January 20, 2016 deposition is an accurate representation of the locations of buildings, water supply wells, monitoring wells, remediation wells, other samplings, and other relevant structures or locations. Deposition Exhibit 95 is attached hereto as Appendix 4."

5. The Parties respectfully request the Court include in the list of Undisputed Facts to be set forth in the Final Pretrial Order the facts currently set forth in the Joint Pretrial Statement as Disputed Facts No. 2, 7-13, 54, 84, and 90.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, the foregoing stipulation is hereby GRANTED. The Court's forthcoming Final Pretrial Order will reflect the parties' stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer