TORRES v. COUNTY OF FRESNO, 1:15-CV-00489-DAD-BAM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160902934
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 01, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER (DOC. NOS. 17 & 19) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . The parties have timely exchanged Rule 26 Initial Disclosures. Defendant County of Fresno (sued as County of Fresno and Fresno County Sheriff's Department) has propounded written discovery on Plaintiff. Plaintiff has requested an extension to respond, that if granted, would afford Defendant's expert little time to review and consider those responses and incorpora
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER (DOC. NOS. 17 & 19) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . The parties have timely exchanged Rule 26 Initial Disclosures. Defendant County of Fresno (sued as County of Fresno and Fresno County Sheriff's Department) has propounded written discovery on Plaintiff. Plaintiff has requested an extension to respond, that if granted, would afford Defendant's expert little time to review and consider those responses and incorporat..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER (DOC. NOS. 17 & 19)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
The parties have timely exchanged Rule 26 Initial Disclosures. Defendant County of Fresno (sued as County of Fresno and Fresno County Sheriff's Department) has propounded written discovery on Plaintiff. Plaintiff has requested an extension to respond, that if granted, would afford Defendant's expert little time to review and consider those responses and incorporate them into his report if necessary. To afford Plaintiff the time requested to respond to the written discovery propounded by Defendant and afford Defendant's expert sufficient time to consider Plaintiff's discovery responses in preparing his report, the parties request a short extension of discovery and expert disclosure deadlines, with all other dates remaining the same.
For all these reasons, the parties, through their respective counsel, have stipulated to modify the Status (Pre-Trial Scheduling) Order (Doc. Nos. 17 & 19) as follows:
Current Date New Date
Expert Witness Disclosure: September 16, 2016 October 7, 2016
Supplemental Expert Disclosure: September 30, 2016 October 21, 2016
Non-Expert Discovery Cutoff: November 18, 2016 December 9, 2016
Expert Discovery Cutoff: November 18, 2016 December 9, 2016
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline: January 11, 2017 Same
Dispositive Motion Hearing: February 6, 2017 Same
Pre-Trial Conference: March 20, 2017 Same
Trial: May 9, 2017 Same
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
