GAINES v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 1:15-cv-00587-RRB. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160909m69
Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING and PLANNING ORDER RALPH R. BEISTLINE , District Judge . At Docket 29 Defendant E. Horowitz has moved for an extension of time within which to to make initial disclosures under Rule 16(b) and to file a motion for summary judgment based upon the failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For good cause shown, the Scheduling and Planning Order at Docket 26 is hereby modified as follows: The parties are hereby granted through and including Monday, November 7, 20
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING and PLANNING ORDER RALPH R. BEISTLINE , District Judge . At Docket 29 Defendant E. Horowitz has moved for an extension of time within which to to make initial disclosures under Rule 16(b) and to file a motion for summary judgment based upon the failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For good cause shown, the Scheduling and Planning Order at Docket 26 is hereby modified as follows: The parties are hereby granted through and including Monday, November 7, 201..
More
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING and PLANNING ORDER
RALPH R. BEISTLINE, District Judge.
At Docket 29 Defendant E. Horowitz has moved for an extension of time within which to to make initial disclosures under Rule 16(b) and to file a motion for summary judgment based upon the failure to exhaust administrative remedies. For good cause shown, the Scheduling and Planning Order at Docket 26 is hereby modified as follows: The parties are hereby granted through and including Monday, November 7, 2016, within which to (1) make the disclosures required under Rule 26(a)(1); and (2) motions dealing with the failure to exhaust administrative remedies, jurisdiction and venue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
