WRIGHT v. FIELDS, 2:15-cv-2291-KJM-EFB P. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160909o10
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 27, 2016, the court issued findings and recommendations, which recommended dismissal of this action for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders after plaintiff failed to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff filed objections on August 31, 2016, in which he requests an extension
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On July 27, 2016, the court issued findings and recommendations, which recommended dismissal of this action for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders after plaintiff failed to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff filed objections on August 31, 2016, in which he requests an extension ..
More
ORDER
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 27, 2016, the court issued findings and recommendations, which recommended dismissal of this action for plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with court orders after plaintiff failed to respond to defendants' motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 24.
Plaintiff filed objections on August 31, 2016, in which he requests an extension of time to prepare an opposition to defendants' motion. ECF No. 27. The court will hold the findings and recommendations in abeyance and grant plaintiff an additional thirty days within which to respond to the summary judgment motion.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the July 27, 2016 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 24) are held in abeyance, and plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to respond to defendants' summary judgment motion. Should plaintiff fail to timely comply, those findings and recommendations will be submitted to the district judge for consideration.
Source: Leagle
