Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BUENROSTRO, 2:95-CR-0504-WBS. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160909o22 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE REPLY BRIEF RE MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Defendant, JOSE LUIS BUENROSTRO, by and through his attorney, John Balazs, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate to extend the due date for defendant's reply brief to the government's opposition to defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE REPLY BRIEF RE MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Defendant, JOSE LUIS BUENROSTRO, by and through his attorney, John Balazs, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate to extend the due date for defendant's reply brief to the government's opposition to defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) to September 30, 2016.

In an order filed August 25, 2016, the government ordered the government to file a response to defendant's expedited motion for release pending a decision by August 31, 2016, and the defense to file a reply by September 7, 2016. On August 29, 2016, the Court granted the Federal Defender's motion to withdraw as counsel and appointed undersigned counsel to represent defendant on his motion. On August 31, 2016, the government filed an opposition to defendant's §3582(c)(2) motion to reduce sentence. New defense counsel needs additional time to prepare a reply brief.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer