Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hooper, 2:16-cr-096 JAM. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160919830 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Tyler Hooper, that the status conference scheduled for September 20, 2016 be vacated and continued to November 15, 2016 at 9:1
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Phillip A. Talbert, Acting U.S. Attorney, through Katherine Lydon, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Sean Riordan, attorney for Tyler Hooper, that the status conference scheduled for September 20, 2016 be vacated and continued to November 15, 2016 at 9:15 a.m.

The reasons for the continuance are defense preparation which includes performing an investigation regarding Mr. Hooper's personal history, meeting with Mr. Hooper regarding the evidence, and further reviewing the 676 pages of discovery the government has produced thus far.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded as of September 20, 2016 through and including November 15, 2016 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from September 20, 2016, up to and including November 15, 2016, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the September 20, 2016 status conference shall be continued until November 15, 2016, at 9:15 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer