Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kalani v. Winco Foods, LLC, 2:16-CV-01931 WBS (ACx). (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160930b16 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [L.R. 144(A)] WILLIAM B. SHUBB , District Judge . Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Robert Kalani ("Plaintiff") and Defendant WinCo Foods, LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that WinCo may have a 14-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant sh
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

[L.R. 144(A)]

Pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiff Robert Kalani ("Plaintiff") and Defendant WinCo Foods, LLC ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that WinCo may have a 14-day extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Pursuant to this extension, a response by Defendant shall be due on or before October 12, 2016.

This stipulation will not affect or alter any deadline previously set by Court order.

The reason for the present extension is that WinCo is investigating the allegations to explore whether further litigation can be avoided.

Pursuant to Local Rule 131(e), counsel for Plaintiff has authorized submission of this document on her behalf.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED that the following deadline applies:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer