Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jay T. v. Sacramento City Unified School District, 2:16-cv-00136-MCE-DB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161003808 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, by and between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District" and referred to with Plaintiffs as, "Parties"), through its counsel of record, as
More

JOINT STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Local Rules 143 and 144, by and between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District" and referred to with Plaintiffs as, "Parties"), through its counsel of record, as follows:

1. On May 16, 2016, the parties agreed, via stipulation, to the following briefing and hearing schedule: (a) Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum to be filed on or before July 22, 2016; (b) District's Opposition Memorandum to be filed on or before August 19, 2016; (c) Plaintiff's Reply Brief to be filed within fourteen days of filing of Opposition Brief; and (d) Hearing on September 22, 2016.

2. On May 17, 2016, the Court ordered the briefing and hearing schedule as proposed by the parties.

3. On July 11, 2016, based upon stated reasons, the parties stipulated to the extension of the ordered briefing and hearing schedule, which the Court so ordered on July 12, 2016. Based upon the Court's order: (a) Plaintiffs' Opening Memorandum in Support of an Award of Attorneys' Fees was to be filed on or before August 31, 2016; (b) the District's Opposition Memorandum was to be filed on or before September 30, 2016; (c) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum was to be filed by no later than 14 days after the District's Opposition Memorandum is filed; and (d) a hearing on the merits was scheduled for November 17, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7 before District Judge Morrison C. England Jr.

4. On August 31, 2016, Plaintiffs filed their opening memorandum and supporting papers.

5. Due to the unforeseen leave of absence of one of the District's attorneys primarily responsible for this matter, including the preparation of the District's opposition memorandum and supporting papers, and impacts on this case and other pending matters as a result of same, counsel for the District requested, and counsel for Plaintiffs agreed, to extend the remaining briefing schedule in this case, as follows: (a) District's Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before October 14, 2016; and (b) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than November 4, 2016. The parties also agreed that the ordered hearing on the merits in this matter may remain on calendar for November 17, 2016 as scheduled.

6. There has been only one previous modification to the proposed briefing and hearing schedule in this matter.

7. Accordingly, the parties request approval for this agreed-upon modification to the briefing schedule.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation between PLAINTIFFS Jay T. and Anne M.-T., individually, and as guardian ad litem for M.M.-T. ("Plaintiffs") and DEFENDANT Sacramento City Unified School District ("District"), and good cause appearing,

The Court hereby orders the briefing schedule in this action to be extended, as follows:

1. District's Opposition Memorandum (limited to 25 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed on or before October 14, 2016; and

2. Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum (limited to 15 pages) and supporting papers shall be filed by no later than November 4, 2016.

The hearing on the merits in this matter set for November 17, 2016, at 2:00 p.m., shall remain on calendar as scheduled.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer