HOLLINS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 1:16-cv-01029 DAD JLT. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161005d30
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 7, 2016, the plaintiff and Ford Motor Company agreed that Ford could have until August 26, 2016 to file its responsive pleading. (Doc. 7) Despite the passage of more than a month since that deadline, Ford has not responded. Despite this, the plaintiff has failed to seek a default. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. Within 14 days, the plain
Summary: ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On August 7, 2016, the plaintiff and Ford Motor Company agreed that Ford could have until August 26, 2016 to file its responsive pleading. (Doc. 7) Despite the passage of more than a month since that deadline, Ford has not responded. Despite this, the plaintiff has failed to seek a default. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. Within 14 days, the plaint..
More
ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On August 7, 2016, the plaintiff and Ford Motor Company agreed that Ford could have until August 26, 2016 to file its responsive pleading. (Doc. 7) Despite the passage of more than a month since that deadline, Ford has not responded. Despite this, the plaintiff has failed to seek a default. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. Within 14 days, the plaintiff SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for her failure to prosecute this action or, within this same 14-day period, she SHALL seek an entry of default as Ford Motor Company.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
