Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOLLINS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 1:16-cv-01029 DAD JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161005d36 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER CLOSING CASE AS TO DEFENDANT CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC ONLY (Doc. 50) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , District Judge . On October 15, 2016, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) as to defendant CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC only. (Doc. 15) Under Rule 41, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or
More

ORDER CLOSING CASE AS TO DEFENDANT CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES CALIFORNIA, LLC ONLY

(Doc. 50)

On October 15, 2016, the plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) as to defendant CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC only. (Doc. 15) Under Rule 41, "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment." Notably, CarMax has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment, though it has filed a motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) and a motion to strike (Doc. 11). Thus, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC according to Rule 41, and to terminate the pending motions (Docs. 10, 11).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer