Filed: Oct. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Justin Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Bennett, to reset a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive pre-trial motions as follows: Defense Filing: November 18, 2016 Government Opposition: December 23, 2016 Defense
Summary: STIPULATION TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr. , Senior District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Justin Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Bennett, to reset a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive pre-trial motions as follows: Defense Filing: November 18, 2016 Government Opposition: December 23, 2016 Defense ..
More
STIPULATION TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Justin Lee, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and Steven B. Plesser, attorney for defendant Bennett, to reset a briefing schedule for the filing of dispositive pre-trial motions as follows:
Defense Filing: November 18, 2016
Government Opposition: December 23, 2016
Defense Replies: December 30, 2016
Hearing on the Motions: January 27, 2017
This continuance is requested as defense needs additional time to complete factual background investigation and legal research. Accordingly, all counsel and defendant agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of lodging of the stipulation through January 27, 2017 should be excluded in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. section 3161(H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. There shall be an exclusion of time in computing the time within which trial must commence under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. section 3161(H)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, and the court hereby finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
