Hardin v. Colvin, 2:15-CV-02435-KJN. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20161104b83
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new due date of December 1, 2016, and all other deadlines be extended accordingl
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENDALL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new due date of December 1, 2016, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended to the new due date of December 1, 2016, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly. This extension is requested because Plaintiff's counsel inadvertently destroyed the paper transcript believing it was a digital record. Defendant has kindly agreed to provide another copy of the paper-only transcript
ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties for a requested extension of Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file her Reply on or before December 1, 2016.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
