Filed: Nov. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 57, 58, 64) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On November 8, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. No. 64.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to c
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE (Doc. Nos. 57, 58, 64) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On November 8, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. No. 64.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to cl..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
(Doc. Nos. 57, 58, 64)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
On November 8, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice. (Doc. No. 64.) In light of the parties' stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. The pending motions for summary judgment (Doc. No. 57 and 58) are terminated as having been rendered moot by this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
